“Of all the issues,
in all the parliaments, in all the world, they chose this one.” It’s not exactly Bogie-level
rhetoric, but then neither does it reach the elevated level one might expect in
a gin-bar. It is though, an issue which some Members of the Senedd,
particularly the Tories, are attempting to turn into some sort of scandal. I’m
referring, of course, to the swearing (or, rather, non-swearing) of oaths
by those giving evidence to the Senedd’s Covid Committee.
Whether swearing an
oath makes any difference to the truthfulness and honesty of a witness is, to
be kind, an open question. Maybe in some rather more god-fearing past the fear
of divine retribution made people more fearful of lying, although if someone’s
life depended on not telling the truth it’s hard to believe that a mere oath
would make a difference. Besides, we live in a more secular society these days,
and fear of divine retribution is greatly reduced. In any event, people
increasingly choose to affirm rather than swear on a holy book anyway, and the potential
spiritual consequences of breaking an affirmation are undefined. (As an
interesting aside, affirmation
wasn’t originally introduced to accommodate atheists as many believe, but to
accommodate Quakers who devoutly followed the biblical teaching of Jesus in the
sermon on the mount in which he told his followers never to swear any oaths on
the basis that they were duty bound to be honest anyway.)
Giving Members of
the Senedd, even the Tory leader, the benefit of the doubt, I’m not convinced
that they really believe that taking an oath before giving evidence will add
much to the probability of truthfulness. I assume that they (yes, even Millar)
have a bit more intelligence than that. I suspect it’s rather more to do with
status, or perceived status. ‘Proper’ inquiries require an oath, so anything
which doesn’t require one is perceived as having a lower status. But where does
that ‘properness’ requirement come from, if not the arcane processes of
Westminster? Wales really doesn’t need to emulate the antiquated customs of the
English system: the purpose of having a parliament of our own is to forge our
own future based on our own values and judgements. Getting hung up on obscure,
obsolete and irrelevant medieval rituals doesn’t exactly help that.
No comments:
Post a Comment