Some people on
his own (Tory) side as well as anti-Brexit campaign group, ‘Best for Britain’
have been rather unkind
to former Chancellor, Lord Lawson, over his application for a carte de séjour, allowing
him to remain resident in France. I can
see why the idea that a prominent Brexiteer opting not just to live in France,
but to complete all the necessary paperwork confirming his right of residence
there, might look to some more than a little hypocritical.
I’m not sure that
it is though. Insofar as the more
prominent Brexiteers really wanted to control movement of people at all, it was
the movement of ‘other people’ – particularly the poorer ones – which was the
subject of their expressed concern. It
was never the intention of rich supporters of Brexit that their own rights
should in any way be curtailed. I think
it goes deeper than that, however. Many Brexiteers
are, and always have been, intensely relaxed about free movement; opposition to
it was merely a device to persuade people to support what was for the
Brexiteers themselves an ideological crusade against the EU.
What exactly is
in the least bit hypocritical about a well-off person who believes that
well-off people should be able to go wherever they like going wherever he likes? Hypocrisy is the wrong accusation; there are
plenty of others much more suitable.
No comments:
Post a Comment