After many months
of difficult negotiations, accompanied by sometimes bitter briefings, leaks,
and recriminations, agreement has finally been reached on one key element in
the increasingly fraught EU negotiations.
Theresa May and David Davis have finally managed to achieve
what look like consensus on the colour of the unicorn which they are going to demand
from the EU. It’s taken two years, but
at last there is now a clear route forward to the point at which the UK government
formally asks the EU to declare its proposals unworkable, unrealistic, and undeliverable.
How on earth they
can possibly imagine that the EU’s insistence on a backstop arrangement for
Ireland – to which they both apparently agreed last December (albeit with their
fingers crossed behind their backs) – can be realised by agreeing a date at
which said backstop comes to an end whilst still not having a clue about what
will replace it, is a mystery only to those who fail to understand the sheer uniqueness
and specialness of the UK. So, most of
the world, then.
Meanwhile, Corporal
Johnson, one of the other ringleaders of this whole process, has been recorded privately
warning that Brexit (or rather the more ‘combative’ approach which the Prime
Minister is going to take in relation to her demand for that unicorn) will lead
to a ‘meltdown’, but like his near namesake, his response is simply to tell
everyone not to panic. But as I recall
from that old TV programme, the customary sequel to “Don’t panic” was a request for “Permission
to panic, sir?”, so we have at least something to look forward to in this
long-running end-of-the-pier show before the entire cast lead the audience over
the end of said pier, waving union flags and singing Rule Britannia out of key.
A good
scriptwriter would have at least some idea about how he’d get his characters
out of the briny for the next episode; but at the moment there’s nothing better
on offer than the traditional “with one
bound he was free”. It’s a plot line
that might have worked on steam radio in the 40s and 50s, but surely no-one
would seriously depend on such a cliched mechanism in this day and age?
No comments:
Post a Comment