There are two aspects of yesterday’s report
that English people living in Wales tilted the vote towards ‘leave’ in the 2016
referendum which cause me concern.
The first is mathematical. It is probably true that English-born
residents of Wales, especially those in the older age groups, voted more
strongly for leave than did those born in Wales. It is also probably true that, if only those
born in Wales had been allowed to vote, then the outcome would have been
different. With a majority as small (in
overall terms) as 82,000, it is easy enough to identify a particular
demographic and say that, ‘but for them, the result would have been different’. But a mathematical majority whose size just
happens to coincide with the number of people in one group doesn’t make that
group ‘responsible’ – and it isn’t the only group that could be identified in
this way. English in-migration doesn’t
account for the results in places like Blaenau Gwent – indeed, the majority for
leave was at its highest in some of the counties where the proportion of
English-born residents is at its lowest.
Whilst the votes cast by English-born residents might have been
sufficient to sway the overall national result, those votes cannot explain some
of the more localised majorities.
And that brings me to my second concern. There will be those who choose to interpret
results like this in a way which blames ‘the English’ for the outcome, and
which leads to complacency about the fact that so many native Welsh voters also
supported leave. The Anglo-British
nationalism which drove the Brexit vote is not an alien philosophy here in
Wales, no matter how much some of us might wish that it were so. Welsh people are not somehow immune to the
curse of xenophobia, the desire to blame ‘others’ for our relative poverty, or
the propaganda of the tabloids.
Concentrating attention on those who have moved in would be a diversion and
a cop-out.