Some people have
expressed surprise at the support coming from Farage and Reform for the
nationalisation of the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe. Based on the premise
that nationalisation is a ‘left-wing’ concept, it would indeed be surprising
for the most ‘right-wing’ party to be supporting it. The flaw, however, lies in
the premise.
It's true that Labour
historically (before Blair got his hands on the party’s constitution) called
for “the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and
exchange”, and that ‘common ownership’ has generally been interpreted as
meaning the same as ‘state ownership’ (the two are not necessarily the
same thing, but that is an issue for another time). It’s also true that, in pursuit
of that goal, the immediate post-war Labour government nationalised the coal
and steel industries in the UK. They also nationalised the railways, although
the background to that is a bit more complex: in the aftermath of the second
world war, the railway system was in a bad way and needed the sort of massive
investment which a patchwork of private companies was never likely to be able
to provide. By and large, the utilities - gas, water, electricity,
communications – were never really nationalised in the sense of being taken out
of private ownership and into public ownership. Most of them had grown out of municipal
undertakings, and the re-organisation was more to do with a transfer between one
part of the public sector and another. Beyond those few examples, where is the evidence for
an ideology-based attempt to bring the means of production under public
control?
In practice,
nationalisation is a tool used by both Labour and the Tories (think Rolls-Royce
under Ted Heath, or the banks under Gordon Brown) to bail out failing
capitalist enterprises. And it has been largely a temporary measure at that,
with the companies sold back into the private sector when they became
profitable again. Once we recognise it as a tool to assist capitalists rather
than to dispossess them, it becomes entirely natural that the political ‘right’
should espouse it too – if not even more natural. The real question is not why
the ‘right’ should be such passionate supporters of nationalising failing
businesses, but why the ‘left’ should be so passionate about doing the same
thing, rather than, say, taking control of enterprises more likely to have a
long term profitable future. Again, though, the flaw is in the premise. Labour
has long-since lost any claim to be ‘of the left’.
2 comments:
Interesting as always
The case for steel is the same as the case for the Monarchy and the £. They are core components of a nation. All parties will scent votes in saving Scunthorpe steel. Labour are no different to Cons or Reform. What makes me spit is that they didn't try to save Welsh Steel. Reveals the nation with a core as being England. UK is a sham when the chips are down. Is it really too late to do something with Port Talbot? Does Net Zero only apply to a Welsh steel plant?
Post a Comment