Wednesday 4 September 2019

How will the cards fall?


Expelling 21 Tory MPs from the Conservative group in the House of Commons solves one problem for the PM, but potentially causes several new ones.  The danger of holding a General Election at the head of a party so hopelessly divided over Brexit was always that in the two likeliest scenarios (another hung parliament or a very narrow Tory majority of seats), a party which contained 20 or more MPs implacably opposed to no deal would resolve nothing.  A majority on paper isn’t the same thing as a majority when it comes to the key votes.  Removing those rebels and replacing them with no deal Johnson loyalists gives him a chance at least of getting a majority which he can use to deliver his do-or-die 31st October exit.
Some of the 21 will go quietly – at least 5 have already said they won’t be standing again anyway – but others may resist and may well have the support of their local membership in resisting.  Philip Hammond, for instance, has already been reselected by his local association.  Johnson certainly can stop them standing as Conservative candidates.  The law was changed some years ago to require that anyone standing under the name of a political party needs formal documentation from their party’s HQ before their nomination can be accepted by the Returning Officer.  (It was a welcome change from the previous situation where anyone could claim to be standing for party X – I can remember a situation many years ago where Plaid Cymru found that it had candidates standing in local elections about whom it knew nothing and whose names were on no membership lists, and I’m pretty certain that other parties had similar issues.)  But he can’t stop them standing as ‘Independent Conservatives’ for instance, nor can he prevent local members and activists from supporting them (although he can expel them too, after the event).  He also can’t stop legal challenges to his decisions, particularly if they can be demonstrated to be arbitrary and/or contrary to the party’s own rule book (I’m not familiar with their rule book, but ‘arbitrary’, given the unpunished record of a number of current cabinet members, looks like a reasonable accusation).  Fighting what looks like being a tight election whilst simultaneously being challenged in the courts and having the vote split between official and unofficial candidates in some seats doesn’t look like the best formula for success.
If the polls are right, the Tories are on course to win around 33-35% of the vote.  It’s probably a record low point for the party but under the inexcusably undemocratic electoral system in the UK it could still be enough to win an absolute overall majority of seats, if everything falls the right way.  That’s a very big ‘if’ though.  As well as the potential losses in the seats currently held by the ‘rebels’, it seems certain that the Tories will lose most or all their seats in Scotland, also losing a number of English seats to the Lib Dems. 
And then there’s the campaign period itself.  I doubt that Corbyn will enjoy a bounce to the extent that he did in 2017, but I’d still expect there to be a degree of improvement over current polling figures not least because of the requirement for broadcast ‘balance’, especially if Labour can manage to come to some sort of agreed position on Brexit.  I doubt that Johnson’s campaign could be anywhere near as bad as that of his predecessor in 2017, but his fly-by-the-seat-of-his-pants approach makes at least a minor gaffe or two near certainties.  But his biggest problem of all, despite all his efforts (and those of Labour) to focus on other issues, will be over Brexit.  If he goes full out on no deal, he loses those few remain votes still going to his party, and if he doesn’t, he probably loses leave votes to Farage plc.
It’s a huge gamble that he’s taking, and one that on balance I think he’ll probably lose, a feeling based mostly on the sheer number of cards that have to fall the right way for him to win it.  I hope that’s more than wishful thinking on my part.

4 comments:

Spirit of BME said...

Very good post.

Jonathan said...

What should I do when I vote in N.Pembrokeshire? I have never voted tactically. Always Plaid Cymru. But in N.Pembs, Plaid has a solid vote, but comes 3rd or 4th depending as you know. Lib Dems have an excellent candidate and our local councillor, Bob Kilminster. Resolute Remain, unlike Plaid until recently. But they come 3rd or 4th depending. Labour could beat Leaver Crabb if Plaid voters (and Lib Dems) and me vote Labour. Labour have held Wales back for 100 years. But I do think stopping Brexit is the biggest issue in peacetime and my 4 children tell me its top of their list. And it would be good for Wales. Hold my nose and vote Labour? Advise, please!

John Dixon said...

Tough call! And the utter lack of clarity from Labour as to the policy they will be putting forward in the forthcoming election doesn't help. Nor does the fact that we know in advance that, even if they win an election as a result of tactical voting, Labour will claim a mandate for the whole of their manifesto, not just the Brexit bit.It probably comes down to who the candidates are and whether you feel that you can trust the leading anti-Brexit candidate to stick to his or her guns rather than cave in to arbitrary and unpredictable whipping after election. And another factor is whether Nigel Farage plc decide to stand - Crabb could lose just by losing votes to someone else. What we need is a proper proportional electoral system so we didn't have to play games and second guess what others will do...

Jonathan said...

Sigh..thanks.....Labour candidate in Pembs is ex-Foreign Office, female. Fingers crossed. I will have to do what the French are so often forced to do in Presidential Elections. Hold my nose and vote pragmatically and tactically for the least bad effective option. One thought of comfort, the UK now has an embryo government of 'National' Unity. It has a narrow but definite and important purpose: stop No Deal (and, I think it follows, 'stop Brexit'). This done, it need not/cannot go much further. Or if it were popular Corbyn might be replaced, rather as Chamberlain went in favour of Churchill. Its not that I have a rooted objection to Labour running the UK (as opposed to Wales). I just don't like unelected Glasgae Labour heavies running a weak and odd Leader/PM. John Smith QC (who set up Devo for Wales) or similar would be completely fine. Long to get back to getting Wales moving though, with a Constitution with Proportional Rep. But needs must, in circs as they are.