I
don’t really expect ministers of the Crown to understand the entirety of their
briefs; that would be too much for people who are generally little more than
political figureheads. So the fact that
one former Northern Ireland Secretary, Owen Patterson, managed to get his figures wrong in
relation to cross-border trade is probably just the result of him being a ‘former’
minister and no longer having civil servants loyally hanging around ready to ‘clarify’
what he really meant. The point that he
was trying to make, as I understood it, was that because trade levels are so
low, the existence of – or nature of – a border really isn’t that important.
Much
more worrying than his lack of grasp of the figures is that a spell in the Northern Ireland office has done nothing
to open his eyes to the fact that borders are about more than trade and
economics. There are few borders,
anywhere in the world, which are as highly charged as that on the island of
Ireland, and the fact that he still thinks it’s all about trade shows the power
of a financial-based ideology to blind its holders to all other factors.
It
does, though, provide a good insight into all that’s gone wrong with the Brexit
process and negotiations from the outset.
Other borders within Europe may not be as sensitive as that between the
Republic and the North, but the continental approach to borders and the
European project has always been imbued with a significance which goes well
beyond trade and economics. The UK
position, on the other hand, has always been driven by the ideologues who see
humans as little more than economic animals, driven solely by pursuit of their own
best financial interest, at the expense of others whenever necessary.
It
is the same blindness to the non-economic factors which led the Brexiteers to
tell us that German carmakers, backed up by Italian Prosecco producers, would
force Merkel and the others to give us a better deal outside the EU than we get
inside. It was that attitude which led
to talk of the deal being the “easiest in
human history” (© Liam Fox). And it
was that attitude which led to the “they
need us more than we need them” approach to the possession and consumption
of cake.
But
if a spell presiding over the Northern Ireland office, dealing with one of the
most emotionally-charged borders in the world, can’t reduce this myopia, then what
can? After the events of this week, I
suspect that the answer is ‘nothing’.
The gulf in perception of what opening borders is about remains as great
– perhaps even greater – now than it was at the outset. And one of the worst aspects of all of this
is that I see little by way of a better understanding on the opposition
benches. The opposition parties seem
almost as fixated by the economics as the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment