One
of the arguments regularly used by independentistas
who prefer not to talk about it is that the economic situation of Wales is too
bad to allow independence at this stage.
It’s an argument that I understand, but I have never understood why,
even if it were true, it means that the case in principle shouldn’t even be
put. Failure to make the case at all –
even as a context for deciding which economic changes are required and in what
timescale – looks more like electoral expedience than principled position. It also gives the impression that we need
‘someone else’ to fix things for us first; and actually, that is a greater
argument against independence than Wales’ undoubted economic problems. A nation which needs ‘someone else’ to fix
things for them doesn’t sound like a nation ready to take responsibility for
its own affairs.
In
any event, I’m far from convinced that our problems are as serious as they’re
made out to be by a political class which actually seems to enjoy being in a
state of dependence. I’ve pointed out previously that on the most commonly
accepted measure of prosperity, GDP per head, Wales is in fact one of the
world’s richer nations. And we are above
the average for member states of the EU.
If those other countries can be successful member states, what stops Wales
emulating them? Why are we so ready to
use only one single comparator – England – rather than taking a wider
view? It’s as though we’re so dazzled by
our nearest neighbours that we’ve fallen into their habit of believing that the
civilized world ends at Dover.
Would
we need to make changes in order to cope with becoming an independent
state? Yes, of course we would; indeed,
that’s the whole point. And since even a
positive vote for independence tomorrow would still lead to a transitional
period before independence actually happened, the government of Wales would
have time during that period to start that process. Add to that the fact that there isn’t going
to be a vote tomorrow – and since it appears unlikely that any party will even
enter the 2021 Assembly elections with a promise to hold a vote, let alone win
those elections and implement that promise, we can probably rule out a vote for at least ten years.
I
find it impossible to believe that any country with our level of GDP per head could
not prepare itself adequately to take control of its own affairs in that
timescale; and any political movement serious about achieving that aim would be
setting out a route map towards that goal.
It isn’t a soft option; far from it.
It is a lot easier to whinge about other people letting us down than it
is to take responsibility for putting things right ourselves. But if that’s the best we can manage, then perhaps
we really aren’t ready even to consider the idea.
1 comment:
You raise perhaps the most important issue facing those who believe in welsh independence, measuring Wales against England is a Unionist ploy to ensure Wales never looks prosperous to most of the population and it works well.
But there is a chink of light, the clearest attempt to address the economic arguments for welsh independence was Adam Price & Ben Levinger report ‘The Flotilla Effect’ about the prosperity of small nations and how Wales would have fared like them if we'd been independent published back in 2011. It’s worth reading just to realise that Wales isn’t the economic basket case many Labour, Tory ad UKIP politicians constantly claim it is.
http://www.english.plaidcymru.org/uploads/downloads/Flotilla_Effect_-_Adam_Price_and_Ben_Levinger.pdf
Post a Comment