Poor Rishi Sunak. All the
indications are that he has gone into the negotiations with the EU over the
Northern Ireland Protocol with the honest but completely mistaken view that he
was trying to make the agreement signed by his predecessor but one work, and
that the way to do that was to be reasonable and reach an agreement which would
benefit all the stakeholders involved. He’s now finding
out just how wrong he was; the objective of those opposing the agreement –
including those who originally negotiated and agreed it – is not to make it
work but to destroy it. The man responsible for the original agreement has never
concealed, from the outset, the fact that he never had any intention of
implementing it. Indeed, he made it so clear that it’s easy to understand his
surprise at the idea that the EU ever thought he was being serious. The EU were
taken completely unawares, despite all the evidence to help them, to find out that
they were dealing with liars all along.
In fairness to the Brexiteers,
they have been fairly consistent in saying that what they want is full access
to the EU single market without following any of the rules which member states
have to follow, on the basis that this would give UK companies a competitive
advantage. They’re right – it would indeed do that. Which is why no-one other
than the English exceptionalists behind Brexit (and their DUP allies) ever
thought for one moment that the EU would concede such an arrangement. In
essence, it’s what those in favour of a ‘pure’ form of free trade have always
wanted – trade with no tariffs, no border controls and no rules. And they
genuinely seem to be so divorced from reality that they actually believed that
they could bludgeon the EU into giving them such a deal.
We don’t yet know the detail
of what Sunak has or has not agreed, although it would be surprising if it was
far away from what has been widely reported in the press. And from that
reporting, it looks like it’s little different from what could have been
achieved in the original negotiation had the UK side been willing to take the
time to discuss and agree rather than make threats and then sign up in haste (to 'get Brexit done') to
something that they were never going to implement. It’s unlikely, though, that
anything that is agreed will be acceptable to the DUP or the Tory extremists if
it leaves any trace of EU laws or rules in Northern Ireland, or any hint of
controls on the movement of goods between Northern Ireland and the UK. It's equally unlikely
that the EU will agree to any deal which does not uphold both those things. And
that would lead us, inexorably, to the establishment of border controls on the
island of Ireland. The Brexiteers would say that isn’t what they want (although
the DUP would probably be delighted). They might even be telling the truth on
that, but only because they’ve always believed two things:
·
Firstly (even if few of them
have said it out loud), that the Republic of Ireland should know
its place and follow
the UK out of the EU, preferably re-joining the UK and swearing loyalty to
the English monarchy at the same time. Their attitude towards Ireland is a bit
like that of Putin towards Ukraine – it’s not a proper country and has no real
right to a separate existence.
·
Secondly, that the UK’s
departure would be the beginning of the end for the EU, which is still the
end-game for many of them.
Where that leaves Sunak and
his renegotiation is a big question. There is some doubt about whether he actually
needs to put his deal to Parliament at all. Under the UK’s arcane system of
semi-democracy, it arguably falls under the royal prerogative, meaning that
ministers can just sign it and implement it. It would make him look frightened
and weak, but he might prefer that to the alternative scenario where he puts it
to parliament and it gets passed by opposition votes with a huge number of
Tories voting against it. Rocks and hard places both leave him weakened, with
the blond-headed shark circling maliciously. And both still leave the
Conservative Party unmanageable and drifting as it attempts to reconcile the two
irreconcilably opposing views on Europe which have destroyed so many of its
leaders over the past three decades. In any functioning democracy, these two
views would be represented by two different parties, but an outdated electoral
system which polarises elections between two parties means that both try to
manage differences within a broad church. Traditionally, that’s been more of a
problem for Labour than the Tories, but it increasingly looks as if it might
turn out to be terminal for the Tories. The coming implosion is almost too kind a way out.
1 comment:
Brit UK politics is resisting the natural impulse to tear apart and re group around new foci. Maybe that's because there are so many competing foci and many of their prime advocates are narrow single issue punters or at best can only muster interest in a handful of issues.
A guy called Steve Richards wrote a contentious book a few years ago where he applauded the "insiders" in politics - people who operated within what we might perceive as conventional parties. He observed that "outsiders" who challenged the status quo would end up morphing into "insiders" if ever they gained power, or would fade away once their single issue was dealt with in some fashion e.g Farage. The present situation within the Tory government and party, along with schisms within the SNP and Scottish politics suggest that Richards' analysis may not prove valid for much longer. Disruptive personalities trigger instability and there is by no means any guarantee that the status quo ante will be restored after the turbulence is over. In the case of UK things in Westminster will most likely revert to "normal" but led by a Starmer coalition of some kind. Shame that Ms Sturgeon won't be around to dig him regularly in the ribs. Or maybe now she is free from the job in Holyrood she could seek a seat for the next UK GE. That should set the cat among the pigeons !
Post a Comment