Any switch
of taxation from what people earn (income tax) to what they buy (VAT) will
almost inevitably have the effect of increasing the proportion of taxes paid by
those on the lowest incomes. But when
they need to raise money, politicians tend to prefer indirect taxes in the
belief that, after the initial shock of any increase, people notice them less,
and resent them less, than a line on a payslip showing how much of their
hard-earned cash is being sent to the Treasury.
They’re probably right in that assumption, but taxing people in a way
that they don’t notice isn’t at all the same thing as taxing them in a way
which is fair.
This
story in the Independent, showing that the outcome of this approach to
taxation is that the less well off pay a higher proportion of their income in
tax when all the taxes are added together should therefore come as no surprise
to anyone. (Apparently, though, it does
to some.) We will never get a progressive taxation
system unless the burden of taxation is shifted away from indirect taxation to
direct taxation on income.
2 comments:
Spot on. I commented on Mr Black's blog a good while back that low income families would probably benefit more from focus on reducing VAT (which no political party seemed bothered about at the time) rather than banging on about raising income tax thresholds. Boy, if I did! Might have touched a raw nerve there.
This is what we need in Wales.
Highly variable rates of VAT which we can manipulate as conditions arise to regulate economic activity
Post a Comment