The headline in
yesterday's Business and Money section of the Sunday Times proclaimed that “City
tells Reeves: we can lend you £80bn”. It’s an example of the way that the
basic facts aren’t always presented in a neutral fashion, because the headline
could equally have read, “City tells Reeves: We have £80bn that we want to save
with the government”. In the preferred version, the banks and financial
institutions are doing us (through the government) a favour by lending us
money; in the alternative version, the banks and financial institutions are asking
us (through the government) to do them a favour by accepting large deposits of ‘spare’
cash.
They both represent
different aspects of the ‘truth’, underlining the way that what looks like a
debt to one person will always look like an investment to another. But which is
actually the best representation of the underlying truth? Imagine that ‘the
City’ is a single corporation here, and that the Chief Financial Officer is
talking to the collective board. Is (s)he going to say, “Look chaps, the
government has got itself into a bit of difficulty, but I reckon that we can
probably divert around £80bn from other places to lend them in order to help
them out”, or is (s)he going to say, “Look chaps, there’s something of a
dearth of safe and profitable investment opportunities at the moment, and the
best thing that we can do would be to deposit £80bn in government funds”? When
deciding how best to manage their money financial institutions are always
looking for a balance between risk and reward, placing some of their money in
high risk, high reward investments and some into lower risk, lower reward
investments, such as government bonds. To put the question another way, when
they are deciding on that balance, do we believe that they operate on the basis
of a community-friendly altruism, or do we believe that they decide on the
basis of what’s best for their shareholders?
Those who believe in
altruistic bankers might like to come and meet the fairies at the bottom of my
garden.
No comments:
Post a Comment