In an article
in yesterday’s Sunday Times, Boris Johnson confirmed in his own words the point
made here
on Saturday – the decisions that he and others have taken (or as his acolytes
insist on putting it, ‘getting the big calls right’), to encourage Ukraine to
fight for total victory over Russia rather then seeking a ceasefire and a
negotiated settlement, whilst at the same time denying them the types of
weaponry which might give them a chance of doing that, will lead, as Johnson
himself says, to a long drawn-out war of attrition, as lives and materiel are
expended by both sides in return for marginal gains of devastated territory.
Johnson’s latest ‘solution’ is to provide more help training Ukrainians who can
be sent to the front line to replace those being killed or wounded. Between 100
and 200 Ukrainian soldiers are currently dying every day, according to government
sources there, but the true number is probably higher – whilst any war is in
progress, both sides exaggerate the number of enemy dead and understate their
own losses. Training 10,000 every 120 days – the target Johnson seems to be
setting – doesn’t even replace the numbers being killed, let alone those being
wounded as well. It’s an approach to war which keeps the conflict going until,
eventually, they run out of Ukrainians to train.
I wonder if Johnson sees – or is even
capable of seeing – these trainees as real people rather than numbers. They are
all somebody’s sons and daughters, fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters;
they are individual human beings with hopes, dreams and aspirations. Yes, of course,
the ‘fault’ lies with Putin and Russia, for launching an unprovoked, illegal
and immoral assault on a neighbouring country. But that doesn’t make it right
to stand on the side-lines and encourage the defenders to fight to the last
Ukrainian, whilst taking the soft option of selectively supplying weaponry,
training replacement soldiers, and implementing economic sanctions at a snail’s
pace against the aggressor. Neither the losses being inflicted by the Ukrainian
defenders nor the inadequate and patchy sanctions will be enough to force
Russia to the table, which is the only way the killing can be brought to an
end. In the meantime, and not for the first time in human history, a nation is
left mourning the loss of a generation, as this
story from Ukraine relates. The immediate priority should be to stop the
slaughter rather than prolong it, but Johnson’s response sounds more like harking
back to what Wilfred Owen called the old
lie than a serious attempt to stop the killing.
1 comment:
"I wonder if Johnson sees – or is even capable of seeing – these trainees as real people rather than numbers." The answer is NOT BLOODY LIKELY ! The man has never viewed anything through any prism other than his own grandiose delusion - the great leader blah blah. His recall of other great leaders, Churchill being the most obvious, is highly selective and shaped to suit his own silly visions/delusions.
Post a Comment