Last week, the Welsh Secretary, Simon
Hart, told
us that he wished Wales hadn’t been able to set its own rules for handling Covid.
In itself, the idea that an Anglo-British nationalist wants Wales and Scotland
to do as they’re told rather than follow their own paths is about as newsworthy
as the revelation that the Pope is a Catholic. In support of his position, he
argued that “if you look at all of the measurements of success or failure, …
actually there was precious little difference between England and Wales”.
It’s one of those statements which has the veneer of truth, but where the situation
is actually rather more complicated.
Leaving aside the fact that no-one could
have known in advance whether different approaches would lead to different
outcomes (which makes his statement a rationalisation after the event, rather
than a reason for not allowing differences in the first place), one of the reasons for the
differences in outcomes being small was that the English government constrained
the ability of Wales to be more different, by, for example, only making
furlough available when England needed it. There is also a danger in his use of
headline figures, because – as the Welsh health minister has pointed
out – a country with an older and often sicker population and higher levels
of poverty would expect to lose a higher proportion of its vulnerable people to
a pandemic where the death rate amongst those groups is higher. The very fact
that the outcome was similar could itself be taken as at least a partial
vindication of the Welsh approach. Statistics need to be interpreted with
caution, rather than just looking at the headline figure, although, in
fairness, Hart is probably just following the cavalier
attitude of his boss. But leaving the numbers to one side, one thing which
has stood out throughout the pandemic – and I suspect that this is what really
irks Hart and his colleagues – is that the approach of Mark Drakeford and the
Welsh government has been overwhelmingly supported by people in Wales, who are
well able to tell the difference between a government trying its best (even if
it didn’t always succeed) to keep people safe, and one more concerned for the
profits of its friends and donors.
More shocking to me was the claim by Hart
that, despite having been an MP for a Welsh constituency for 9 years before
being appointed to the Cabinet, he had never
heard of the Barnett formula. That really is an astounding admission to
make, although it was probably part of what qualified him – in Johnson’s mind
at least – to take on the job. Looking around the cabinet table, it is easy to conclude that ignorance is a qualification under the current
regime rather than an impediment. On the other hand it could just be that whatever
some
of those providing him with cash were after, it wasn’t a detailed knowledge
of Wales or its finances.
No comments:
Post a Comment