Since Boris Johnson’s party defeated the
Conservatives in the last election, the Prime Minister has declared several
times that the UK will not be returning to the austerity policies of the wicked
Conservatives. He has also repeatedly insisted that there will be no
significant tax increases. Meanwhile, his next-door neighbour has been equally
insistent that the UK will have to return to a ‘sustainable’ level of debt (something
which he is completely unable to define) and ‘repay’ the costs of dealing with
the pandemic, and seems to be using that ‘requirement’ to repay debt as his
excuse to launch an attack on public sector pay. He argues
that this is not austerity at all, which leads to the conclusion that it’s the
word that they object to rather than the policy. But a rose would still look
and smell like a rose if it were called a skunkflower, as Shakespeare didn’t
quite put it.
It certainly is true (and this is one of
the excuses used for an attack on public sector pay) that job losses and lost
income have impacted the private sector more severely than the public sector
during the pandemic, but the consequent suggestion that the solution is to
reduce the real income of public sector workers looks more like levelling down
than the levelling up which we’re being continually promised. It’s also silly,
even in simple economic terms. One of the key factors in ensuring economic
recovery in the private sector is to maintain a level of demand in the economy; ensuring that all
employees feel equally fearful about their future income levels is counterproductive.
It is also true that the UK’s annual
deficit is large and growing, and that is working its way through to what
are clearly very high levels of total debt compared to GDP (although the extent
of that is somewhat exaggerated by the fall in GDP as a result of the
pandemic). But to claim that that must be repaid is to look at only one side of
the equation; those to whom the debt is owed are in no great hurry to be
repaid and many of them don’t really want to be repaid at all. In the first
place, of the approximately £2 trillion total, almost £900 billion of that
(approaching half) is owed to the UK Government. Calling it a debt is just an
accounting trick perpetrated for political ends. It’s simply not the case that
the UK Government is demanding that the UK Government repays this debt urgently,
or even at all. And the rest of the debt is what looks to those to whom it is
owed like savings or investments, which carry a low level of interest but are
entirely secure. If the government insisted on repaying them, what would they
do with the money? They’d probably look to reinvest most or all of it,
preferably in new government bonds – if not in the UK then elsewhere, hardly
something which is going to help economic recovery.
There is no debt crisis, and there is no
sign that there will be one any time soon. Politicians who pretend that there
is – aided and abetted by the media – are peddling a lie. Controlling public
sector wages is based on ideological hostility to the public sector, not on
economic necessity. In some ways, Boris Johnson’s new party looks quite a lot
like the Conservative Party of old which it replaced, just with more blatantly dishonest
spin.
1 comment:
... while committing to spending billions of extra "scarce" loot on all sorts of new defence initiatives including a beefed up navy !. Of course Boris still hums "Britannia rules the waves" as he dreams up yet another policy inconsistent with the previous. If public sector salaries was a real problem why have they agreed a seriously good award for M.P's After all, a government built around "gestures" should have appreciated a bit of sacrifice nearer home.
Post a Comment