Whilst the
availability of better and cheaper technology has made the question more
pertinent, it isn’t a new question. It
was one which was debated in the old Vale of Glamorgan Borough Council back in
the 1980s, when I was a member of that council.
The ruling group at
the time (Tories, as it happens, but it could equally have been the other lot)
wanted to bar the recording of meetings and proposed a resolution to achieve
that – banning the use of ‘recording instruments’. It was aimed at the press, rather than the
public – the idea that the public might want to record their goings on would
have seemed more than a little strange to them.
When it was
debated, I rose to my hind legs, brandished my biro non-aggressively, and
announced that I was holding a ‘recording instrument’ in my hand. Were they, I asked, going to ban the use of
biros in the Chamber as well? The motion
was hastily amended to refer to, as I recall, ‘mechanical recording instruments’,
and despite my own continued objections was duly passed.
The arguments for
banning the practice then were much the same as they are now – and they have
grown no more valid with the passing of time.
Despite what some councillors claim, it is no easier to quote someone
out of context using a voice recorder than it is using a biro – but at least in
the one case there’s a record to demonstrate whether it was, or was not, out of
context.
There is an
expressed fear about being misquoted, but I rather suspect that the fear is
about not being misquoted.
I don’t think that
I was the most articulate and coherent speaker in the council chamber (although
I’m immodest enough to claim that I wasn’t the most inarticulate either), and
anyone who does a lot of public speaking will be only too aware that sometimes
things can come out not quite as intended.
I was often misquoted by the local press for things I’d said in the Council
Chamber – but here’s the thing: what appeared in print was invariably an improvement
on what I’d actually said. All
hesitations and slips ups were miraculously removed by the local journos in the
interests of creating a readable story.
Could it just be
the case that some councillors in Carmarthenshire (unnamed to protect the
potentially guilty) are actually more worried about not being misquoted?
2 comments:
Llygad dy le, Borthlas! I've heard senior councillors and officers say things - sometimes at length - which they probably hope don't get reported. And in one or two cases, the absence of recordings has enabled them to deny saying what they said when it was reported.
The wisest policy for some would be to follow the example set by many of Carmarthenshire's elderly Indpendents and not say anything at all.
Now now John,
They still missed the point, is a biro not a mechanical device?
You could have had them running round in circles like headless chickens, then again half of them were about as bright as...
R
Post a Comment