The one common
thread seemed to be that "something
must be done", although what that "something" is was pretty
vague and undefined - largely, one suspects, because there was no clear
agreement on what the problem really is; only on the symptoms.
I thought the
approach in Dylan Jones Evans's blog was more incisive, highlighting as it did
one of the key issues which the Mail seemed to have completely missed, namely
that where people choose to study is a key determinant of where they go on to
live and work after graduation. Dylan
goes on to highlight the Welsh government's tuition fee policy as a key factor
in that decision. I was with him on the
first part but thought that he was stretching the point a bit on the second.
The tuition fees
policy pursued by the One Wales government between 2007 and 2000 was much more
focused on encouraging students to stay in Wales to study, and there was, as
Adam Price forcefully pointed out at the time, some indication that it was
having precisely that effect. Sadly, the
then Labour-Plaid government scrapped the policy on grounds of affordability,
only to replace it with what looks like a much more expensive policy a year
later, after the change in government in London
finally allowed Labour in Wales
to disagree with the policy of the UK government.
There are a number
of issues which drive Welsh students to study in England
rather than in Wales,
but they go well beyond the tuition fees policy. Students take into account their perceptions
about comparative "quality" (although whether those perceptions are justified
is another matter entirely) of universities in Wales
and England. There are also questions about the range of
subjects available – the sheer number of universities in England compared with Wales makes it all but inevitable
that there will be a greater range of subjects available.
There was an
assumption underlying the way that the story was presented that it is
inherently a “good" thing that Welsh domiciled students stay in, or return
to, Wales after graduation. That's
certainly a point with which I would agree; as a nationalist I want to see a Wales where
young people wish and are able to live and work and enjoy rewarding and
fulfilling careers in their chosen fields.
(In pure economic terms, however, it isn't as simple
as that. If Welsh students studying and
then living elsewhere are replaced by English students studying and living
here, the economic effect of the so-called brain drain is far from clear-cut.)
That in turn raises
the perennial question of what higher education is for. Is it to provide the right number of
graduates in the right disciplines to meet the current and future economic
needs of Wales? Such an approach undervalues the idea of more
abstract learning having an intrinsic value in its own right, but it did seem
implicit in some of the comments being made.
Concentrating simply on meeting the economic needs of Wales is surely
an inadequate mission for our universities.
One other point struck
me as being relevant, and it’s to do with the “internal” brain drain.
Concentrating
merely on net loss from Wales
to England ignores the
significant net movements happening regionally within Wales. Areas such as Dyfed and Gwynedd lose a high
proportion of their most well-educated young people to Cardiff and the south-east every year. A concentration merely on the net movements
between England and Wales
completely loses sight of this fact.
Far from being the
dry and irrelevant issue as which some want to paint it, I see greater autonomy
for Wales and greater
devolution within Wales
as being key issues in developing a more balanced and dispersed economy
internally. Re-localisation is what will
provide opportunities to young people to live and work in their own
communities. It doesn't guarantee of
course that they take them, but giving them the choice would be a good start.
1 comment:
According to Glyn Davies MP for Montgomeryshire in his contribution of regional pay in the Westminster house this morning, he said that when he was on the local council his farming business suffered from staffing issues because of the relatively higher level of pay for staff in the council. He obviously believes that clerical officers would be tempted into milking his cows if they get paid less, and social workers would be tempted to swap jobs and shovel his manure if there was less pay at the pay the local authority. (I'm not joking, that's the point he made). The reality is, and you highlight it in this blog, regional pay is more likely to tempt workers on a 'career ladder' to move geographically, an already existing process. This is the reason why there is an existing 'brain drain' within Wales, even when a standardised pay structure exists. Obviously. Glyn Davies is talking manure, and the points you make above, show why.
Post a Comment