The Foreign Secretary
isn’t the first English politician to get confused over the difference between
English and British, and he won’t be the last. Perhaps he does, however,
deserve some sort of award for the speed with which he moved from one to the
other in an article he wrote for yesterday’s Sunday Times (referenced here
in today’s Guardian). The far right rioters, he wrote, have “forgotten about what it means to be
English”, before going on to say that they “need to integrate back into
Britishness”. The values from which he claims that they have opted out are
thus, according to him, English; the society of which they have ceased to be a
part is British. He probably sees no difference between being English and being
British, and he’s far from being alone in that. But being unable to understand
the difference is precisely the point – understanding anything about modern culture
and identity in the UK requires a basic understanding that there isn’t one single
universal definition. It’s an understanding whose absence he has so clearly
demonstrated.
No comments:
Post a Comment