It’s long struck me
as being a curious aspect of the world of football that a manager who leads one
team to trophy after trophy turns out to be an utter failure when he transfers
to another team, and that a manager who has a hopeless record with one team
goes on to have a huge run of success with another. It’s almost as if what
matters is whether the team is functioning well or not rather than the attributes
of the manager. If the team is dysfunctional, it doesn’t matter how good the
manager is, the team will continue to fail.
None of that only
applies in football, of course; and that latter point about appointing a new
manager not making any difference to an utterly dysfunctional team is one which
the English Conservative and Unionist Party has already tested to destruction.
Although that hasn’t deterred them from seizing the current contest as an opportunity to add further proof to the
theorem.
There is another
strange parallel between the two worlds as well. No matter how badly a manager
does with one team before being sacked, there will always be some fans who
believe either that he should be brought back to try again, or else that, despite
all the evidence, he is the obvious candidate for any management job which
comes along. And that brings us to Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson. Having
wrecked what rather likes to call itself “the world’s most successful party”,
he is still being suggested and promoted for other jobs, where he would be free
to wreck other organisations. Last week, we were told that he was being
lined up to wreck the Daily Telegraph. Don’t get me wrong here – wrecking
the Torygraph would be almost as big a favour to the UK as wrecking the Tory
Party – it’s just that I somehow doubt that that is quite what his backers have
in mind. Although, given his demonstrated propensity to swing between giving
Johnson his total support and then pulling the rug from under him, perhaps
Zahawi is really planning to sack him a day or two after taking control.
Ten months ago, it
was reported that Johnson was going to become
a presenter on GB News, although he has yet to make his debut performance.
I don’t know whether he’s been paid for that ten months, but it’s at least
possible that GB News would prefer to pay him for not turning up and wrecking their
channel. It would almost be a sign of intelligence amongst channel bosses. And
taking the money without doing very much for it isn’t exactly new. Johnson was,
apparently, paid an advance of £88,000 for a book on Shakespeare for
publication in 2016. The publishers are still waiting. Fortunately, he’s found a
different publisher for his memoirs, who have apparently stumped up £510,000
for the privilege of publishing the tome, if it’s ever finished. That last may
turn out to be another triumph of hope over experience.
Throughout it all,
his long-term fans and sycophants still hold on to dreams about him returning
to once again take the reins of a party in crisis, forgetting his role in
creating that existential crisis in the first place. Perhaps their dreams will
come true in the next or next but one leadership election (they can surely fit
at least two more in before the next election) – but could we really get that
lucky?
1 comment:
You make your point well.
Politics and sport do clearly believe in the ‘Golden Boys ‘ theory where people are hired/ nominated for the carefully put-together image than actual substance.
In the US ,JFK and his brother traded on their name and image , but to get things done you needed Lyndon Johnson who figured out early that the Kennady brother were a waste of time.
The Boy Johnson over here is a classical model in that he has never managed (especially his own life) anything with any organizational dimension with any success.
In the world of sport, I recall that Manchester United bought in a player at an outrageous price with no guarantees of any success on the field.
But they bring this ‘glow’ that changes some outcomes .
I believe that footballer in question more than paid for his purchase price ,by the sale of his numbered shirt in the Asian market in less than three months. That is good business.
Of course, in politics there are those that have the opposite effect and their very name is , how shall I say this – negative.
Keir Rodney Stamer comes to mind.
Post a Comment