The untrue smear used by Johnson against
Starmer this week was a low blow, so low that an increasing number on his own
side have been repelled by it, and some of his ministers have been forced into
giving farcical
responses to questions. He’s presumably working on the assumption that if
he can only somehow demonstrate that everyone is as bad as he is, then people
will forgive his own sins. It’s a curious tactic, though, for at least two
reasons. Firstly, he accused Starmer of prosecuting journalists instead of
paedophiles, but there is surely a danger that he might also be reminding
people that some journalists might deserve to be prosecuted – especially those,
perhaps, who conspire
to have their colleagues beaten up, yet somehow get away with it. But
secondly, insisting that the man at the top must take the blame personally for everything
done by those under his management is a risky tactic for someone who is
reportedly on the verge of sacking
a number of staff in order to preserve his own skin. Even if the tactic weren’t
proving to be so counter-productive on his own side, neither comparison strikes
me as being particularly helpful to himself.
1 comment:
Craig Murray, who is often contrary but always interesting, has a very different take on this. Mind, he's no fan of Mr Starmer.
Post a Comment