The difference in approach to the pandemic
between the English government and the Welsh government has been on display
again this week, with the Welsh government inching
cautiously towards further restrictions whilst Booster Johnson claims that
there is no need for further action because the trend is in line with what was
expected. It is, according to him, all going to plan. Drakeford’s caution is
understandable; short of independence, he simply does not have the power to
take the necessary economic steps to back up further restrictions to the extent
which the situation requires, and in the absence of action by the UK Treasury,
unilateral action in Wales would mean people here paying a high price. His
unionist mindset prevents him reaching the logical conclusion, in the absence
of which we are likely to end up with the worst of both worlds – continuing
with the highest rate of infection as well as the tightest restrictions.
However, Johnson’s claims about everything
being in line with the plan deserve rather more scrutiny than they are being
given. The daily rate of premature deaths due to the pandemic is currently
erratic to say the least, but the number of deaths per week has been 500 or
more for the last three months, and is currently running at around 750.
Johnson’s ‘plan’ effectively assumes that it will continue at that rate for the
remainder of the autumn and winter. To put that another way, the UK government proactively planned to stand aside and allow more than 7,500 deaths over the last three
months and is planning to allow another 10,000 or more preventable premature
deaths over the next few months. Seen from Downing Street, these 17,500 people
(on top of those who died during the earlier stages of the pandemic) are mere
statistics, an ‘acceptable price’ to pay for maintaining the profits of the
capitalists who fund the Conservative Party.
But each of those people is an individual,
with family, friends and maybe others who depend on them. The death rate due to
Covid may be an obvious example of government priorities, but it doesn’t stand
in isolation – the government’s approach to benefits will plunge millions of
people into poverty this coming winter. The surprising thing is that this
callous approach to the health and wellbeing of ordinary citizens has not led
to more dissent. Donald Trump famously said that
he could stand on 5th Avenue in New York and start shooting people, and it
wouldn’t affect his support. Boris Johnson is demonstrating the truth of the sentiment.
It underlines the extent to which
capitalist ideology and the selfishness associated with it have come to
dominate thinking. Trump’s supporters didn’t believe that they would be the
ones being shot on 5th Avenue, and Johnson’s supporters don’t believe that
they’ll be the ones dying or being impoverished by his actions. They see it,
probably subconsciously without even really thinking about it, as being in
their own interests to believe the lie that the poor have only themselves to
blame, or that the victims of Covid have either brought it on themselves or
would have died soon anyway. And it is in the interests of capital and those
who own and control it to ensure that most of us never get to understand that
we have more in common with each other than we do with them. It doesn’t help
that the main opposition party at UK level basically buys into the same
ideology; they might want to tinker a bit with some of the detail, but the
basics are broadly accepted, along with the need to ensure that we remain divided.
It doesn’t have to be this way, though;
there are other ways of organising an economy or a society. Where are the
politicians brave enough to make the case? Anyone not making the case against the current system is effectively supporting its continuation.
No comments:
Post a Comment