This week, both the UK and the US have
reported record levels of deaths from the pandemic. The US is reporting truly
horrific numbers, and this is rightly being blamed on the chaotic leadership of
the outgoing president, Donald Trump, who has spent the last few months
fixating on imaginary electoral fraud instead of getting to grips with the
pandemic. With the daily death toll passing 4,000 for
the first time yesterday, and a total of 356,000 deaths to date, the incoming
president, Joe Biden, has a huge task on his hands in trying to get control of
a problem which has been ignored and downplayed by his predecessor. We need to
remember, though, that absolute figures can be misleading, and relative numbers
are usually more informative. With a population of 330 million, one would
expect that the US would have a larger death toll than smaller countries even
if its leader had given the problem his full attention, although that will
provide little comfort to those impacted.
The UK has had a much smaller number of
deaths in total. To date, the total is somewhere between 80,000 and 95,000
(depending on whether we start with the official daily running total or the ONS
analysis of excess deaths) and has this week gone above 1,000 per day for the
first time since April. The UK population is 66 million, about one fifth of
that in the US, so one would reasonably expect, even if the level of competence
and control was no better than that of Donald Trump (and that’s a very low bar
indeed), that the death toll both overall and in terms of the daily peak would
be no greater than one fifth of that in the US. Simple maths, however, tells us
that it is worse – and significantly so. One fifth of the US totals would
amount to 800 per day and an overall total of 71,000, both of which have been
comfortably exceeded by the UK’s ‘world-leading’ performance.
What this tells us, in simple terms, is
that the UK under Boris Johnson has performed less well than the US under the
chaotic regime of Donald Trump. That’s worth repeating: Boris Johnson has
demonstrably done an even worse job of managing the pandemic than Donald Trump.
Yet still the sycophantic UK media trumpet the ‘world-beating’ promises and
statements of Johnson and his cronies as though they have some relationship
with fact. Poor management of the pandemic isn’t the only similarity. Both men
have had their attention diverted by products of their own imagination – in the
US it’s imaginary voter fraud and in the UK it’s the imaginary benefits of
Brexit. Both have shown an astonishing inability to empathise with others,
particularly those who have lost so much. Both seem to believe that they are
the real victims – Trump of a vast conspiracy to steal an election and Johnson
of being made
to do things he hates. Instead of learning from experience and
changing their approach, both heap praise on themselves for their achievements
and seem genuinely surprised or even upset when others don’t do the same. And
whilst the removal of either doesn’t guarantee a more successful approach, it
is in both cases an essential precondition. The difference is that Trump is
going now – we could be stuck with Johnson for almost four more years.
2 comments:
I find it very difficult to get into the numbers game as context is everything and there are plenty of indicators that numbers are (again) being managed to fit the propaganda.
In terms of managing the problem, Donald John and The Boy Johnson have the same problem – they are not in charge of day-to-day policy or operational management as over here they are sub-contracted to HMG`s in Scotland, the North of Ireland, and Wales. My chums in the former colonies tell me that the states determine the same and much more and it is up to them what investment they put into the health structure.
Now the screens are going dark, as the Scotsman reports that no longer in Scotland will they, give figures on distribution and quantity of the jab ,so that becomes a secret and in England the NHS have declared that they will discontinue with bed occupancy rates -that is understandable as the last three weeks of December showed they were lower than in 2019, but the message was, everything was falling apart, so there is a justification in order to keep the fear factor high so that people obey their rules.
Spirit,
"... numbers are (again) being managed to fit the propaganda ... no longer in Scotland will they give figures on distribution and quantity of the jab ... in England the NHS have declared that they will discontinue with bed occupancy rates ... the last three weeks of December showed they were lower than in 2019" I'm not entirely sure of the veracity of much of that, I'm afraid.
"Donald John and The Boy Johnson have the same problem – they are not in charge of day-to-day policy or operational management as over here they are sub-contracted to HMG`s in Scotland, the North of Ireland, and Wales. My chums in the former colonies tell me that the states determine the same and much more and it is up to them what investment they put into the health structure." In terms of the US, that's a reasonable point. However, in the UK, Johnson is directly responsible for the 85% which is not devolved. Devolution doesn't let him off the hook at all.
"... to keep the fear factor high so that people obey their rules." Whilst I tend to agree with your distrust of the actions and motivations of those who rule over us, what I don't understand here is 'Why?'. Why would they want people to follow rules which they and we know are severely damaging to the economy unless they believe those rules to be entirely necessary on public health grounds? I suppose one might argue that Sunak's little summer wheeze to pay people to go to restaurants and spread a pandemic which was otherwise starting to flag was part of a grand conspiracy to spread fear amongst us, but I'm afraid I tend to the simpler explanation that he's just stupid and incompetent.
Post a Comment