The
entire cabinet was given an hour’s detention yesterday after agreeing to
something (although on the basis of past
experience they probably didn’t know what they’d agreed to) so that they
couldn’t get their usual blow-by-blow accounts of the meeting into the public domain
through ‘briefings’ and whispers before the headmistress had given hers. When the vegetables eventually
found out what they’d agreed to, it was too late to change it.
The
statement which
she eventually made after the marathon cabinet meeting yesterday has been
widely interpreted as representing a significant change in her position (for
example, this,
from the BBC); some sort of Plan B. But it
looks more like a repackaged Plan A to me.
The
core elements are:
·
Meet
Jeremy Corbyn to ‘consult’ over possible alternative options give him
another lecture on why her plan is the only one available
·
Ask
the EU for a short extension which takes us past the point of no return for
participating in the Euro elections, and makes any longer extension legally
impossible
·
Attempt
to bully her own party into line by threatening the extremists with a softer
Brexit
·
Attempt
to cajole a few more Labour MPs into supporting her by threatening a no-deal
Brexit
·
Run
down the clock until the new ‘final’ date when the alternative becomes her deal
or no deal (without participating in the elections, the right to unilateral
revocation would have to have been taken off the table by any grant of an
extension by the EU)
·
Resign
as soon as she gets her deal through, leaving one of her party’s extreme
Brexiteers to take over and tear up whatever agreement she’s managed to reach
with the EU and/or the Labour Party
In
what way, exactly, is that any different from what she has done to date? It doesn’t take no deal off the table;
indeed, it makes it more likely unless Labour agree to support her plan. Why else would the Brexiteers in her cabinet
have supported her? Labour MPs would
have to be certifiable to trust a single word she says given her history (although
sadly that’s about the most credible aspect of her plan). Hopefully, the EU will show the same wisdom
and patience that they showed last time she asked for an extension and offer
only a lengthy one (with the option of reducing it in the event of agreement
being reached sooner) on condition of participating in the elections. It is surely clear by now that a rushed
decision will be a bad decision, and that the UK needs more time to find a proper
consensus plan going forward rather than one achieved by bullying under the pressure of
the clock.
No comments:
Post a Comment