There is,
however, an element of dishonesty involved.
Looking at what they’re saying in detail, actually, few of those so busy
getting themselves worked up really seems to object to the idea that Scottish
MPs per se should determine which party leads the government. They’d all be quite happy – and even the
Tories seem to be happy with this – for an English Tory majority to be outvoted
by a Labour Party whose seat total only exceeds that of the Tories as a result
of Scottish Labour MPs. It’s only if the
MPs come from the SNP that the result would be, apparently, outrageous.
Whilst I can
see why they’d prefer that the Scots were a bit better behaved (from their
perspective at least), and did the decent thing by voting for one of the
parties which ‘won’ the referendum, I cannot see whay 50 extra MPs supporting a
Labour Government in key votes is acceptable if they’re members of the Labour
Party but some sort of affront to democracy if they’re from the SNP. The outcome is exactly the same. As it would be if the extra 50 votes came
from Green MPs in England. Or, dare I
say it, Lib Dems.
An even bigger
assault on logic is that the people fulminating now are, in many cases, exactly
the same people who wanted, pleaded with, threatened and begged the Scots to
vote to remain a part of the UK, and send their MPs to be a ‘strong voice’ in
the UK Parliament. When they were saying that they wanted the Scots to continue to participate in the affairs of the UK, I don’t remember any
of their entreaties including a caveat that the Scots should not be able to
vote for a party of their choice, or that Scots MPs should only be allowed to
participate in the Government of the UK if they came from a UK-wide party.
The bed in
which the complainers are now lying is the bed they chose to make; the fact
that the result of their efforts isn’t quite as they planned is hardly a valid
basis for complaint.
2 comments:
"I cannot see whay 50 extra MPs supporting a Labour Government in key votes is acceptable if they’re members of the Labour Party but some sort of affront to democracy if they’re from the SNP. The outcome is exactly the same".
One would hope that one difference is that those key votes would be on measures of a rather more robust and, dare I say it, socialist nature.
Indeed one would. But such a difference in the nature of the issues upon which they are voting isn't a great difference in principle which makes the one acceptable and the other an affront.
Post a Comment