Whilst the fact
that Wales’ 19th largest authority has done better than the 18
larger ones above it doesn’t disprove the notion that smaller authorities find
it harder to deliver consistent high quality services, it very much disproves the
notion that size is the sole or even the main determinant of performance. Yet the wholly subjective argument that Wales’
local authorities are ‘too small’ has been one of the key arguments of those
wanting to rush headlong into an arbitrary reorganisation of local government.
Where does it
leave the proposed merger of Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire? Pembrokeshire is the 14th largest
authority – that doesn’t sound too different from 19th, but by
population, Pembrokeshire would represent around 60% of the new county. Pembrokeshire’s Estyn report
was, shall we say, rather less glowing than that received by Ceredigion.
That means that there are
some other questions which need to be asked: When two organisations of
different size merge, which culture is likely to be dominant – that of the smaller
or that of the larger? And when it comes
to amalgamating the staff and management posts, which authority is likely to
predominate - the larger, or the smaller?
And where will most of the councillors making the appointments come from
– the larger or the smaller?
I know which I
think is likeliest to happen – believing that the smaller will prevail would be
to elevate hope and optimism over logic and experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment