It’s the sort of
convention that governments like, and when all ministers are chosen by the
Prime Minister, who can dispose of those who dare to disagree, it’s a powerful
tool for motivating the ‘payroll vote’ to support government policy.
It’s a convention,
though, which is better suited to one-party governments than to coalitions, and
the fact that it has been so rarely challenged has as much to do with the
unusualness of coalitions as anything else.
And it’s a convention which has been adopted – unthinkingly as far as I
can see – by the National Assembly in Cardiff as well.
I can understand
why coalition partners would be expected to support the government position on all
matters covered in the formal coalition agreement, but I cannot understand why
the convention should apply to all decisions taken by the government, even if
those decisions are both outside the formal agreement and contrary to the
stated policy of one of the coalition partners.
I certainly did not understand why the junior partners in One Wales
found it necessary never to disagree in the Senedd with anything that the
senior partners said or did.
In that context,
the decision of the Lib Dems in London to
abstain on a motion welcoming Cameron’s removal of the UK from the
negotiating table in the EU is a very welcome challenge to the convention. I hope that we will see more of them.
So why only half a
cheer? Because I’m completely convinced
that if the same thing had been done by a party other than the Lib Dems, then the
Lib Dems would have been the first to condemn such an outrageous breach of
convention. Consistency of argument has
never been one of their strong points.
But having put down a marker in this way, I’d be delighted to see them
showing a bit more consistency from here on in.
No comments:
Post a Comment