This week, we were
the ‘lucky’ recipients of a 12 page newsletter from the soon-to-be-former
Government Chief Whip, Simon Hart. Amongst other things, he tells us that he
campaigns against the Labour-Plaid Welsh Government “who are adamant in
their desire to downgrade and shut down the hospital”, without specifying
to which hospital he is referring, although the leaflet is more explicit when
it comes to his plan for Carmarthen, which claims that the Welsh Government “wants
to close Glangwili Hospital”. It’s a sort-of-truth, although a more
balanced account would point out that the intention is to replace it with a
bigger, better, and brand new facility further west. The merits or otherwise of
that proposal are fair game for political debate, of course, but presenting it
simply as a ‘closure’ isn’t entirely honest.
We are also told
that the 20mph default speed limit (or ‘blanket’ limit to use the inaccurate
term so favoured by the Tories, including in this leaflet) isn’t working and
that “half a million people have said so” by signing a petition. The
pedant in me says that the petition may indeed demonstrate that the policy isn’t
exactly the most popular ever, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it isn’t
working. Policies can be both unpopular and effective. Unless, of course, the
only determinant of the ‘success’ of any policy is its popularity – but only a
confirmed cynic would accuse a Tory politician of believing that.
More generally, both
of those items reflect the fact that the most striking thing about this leaflet
for a Westminster election is the extent to which it concentrates on devolved
issues over which the MP (whoever he or she might be) will have little or no
influence. I suppose, given the record of the UK Government, fighting the
election on the record of a different government of which he has not been part
makes a certain amount of sense. The attempt to portray the current government’s
record on the economy as a success simply underlines the extent to which such a
campaign would have to depend on ‘alternative facts’.
In the same vein, we
come to the section on ‘free’ childcare, where he bemoans the fact that Wales
is not precisely aping the English scheme, but is instead introducing an income
threshold. The first problematic aspect of this is the claim that it will be ‘free’
in England whilst it is means-tested in Wales. In fact, the English government
is underfunding the scheme to such an extent that nurseries are going to be
charging parents top-up fees, because they are not going to be paid enough to
cover their basic costs of staffing and premises (even if we assume that there
will be enough places available, which is far from being certain). They’re not
allowed to call them top-up fees of course, so they will be billed as things such
as “consumables” (and, whilst it’s not wholly unreasonable to charge for things
like food, there will be, we can be sure, an element of creativity to maximise
the opportunity to make up for the government funding discrepancy; and for the poorest of working parents, it does less than it could to help people back into work). Most parents
are likely to understand that a charge of around £2 per hour might mean that
the childcare is cheaper, but it won’t fit most people’s definition of ‘free’. Claiming
to have delivered the equivalent amount of cash to enable Wales to underfund
childcare to the same extent might be ‘true’, but it doesn’t overcome the basic
problem of underfunding.
But the hypocrisy in
this is that the party which has previously argued
that prescriptions should be means-tested so that hypothetical Welsh millionaires
can’t get hypothetical free paracetamol is now arguing that those same hypothetical
Welsh millionaires should be able to get hypothetical free childcare. I’d like
to think that it was a Damascene conversion to the concept of universality in
the delivery of public services, but I suspect that this – like much of the
other criticism of what the Welsh Government does – is much, much simpler than
that. They simply believe that the Welsh government should always use its
powers in ways that deliver the same policies as England. Still, the good news
is that the soon-to-be-former Chief Whip won’t have to worry about any of this for
much longer.
5 comments:
Simon Hart getting his share of the Hester millions.
We're always looking for campaign material for the Welsh Political Archive at the National Library of Wales. Would you be willing to send us a copy of this please? We have people who collect during election campaigns but material this early often gets missed.
Welsh Political Archive, The National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3BU
Many thanks
OK - will post it on during the coming week.
Thank you
Leaflet received - thank you!
Post a Comment