Conventional wisdom decrees
that Labour lost the Uxbridge by-election because of the Ultra-Low Emission
Zone (ULEZ), and Labour and the Conservatives alike have since been furiously back-pedalling
on anything that looks like a commitment to halting climate change. I wonder, though,
whether there is rather more nuance here. Did they, in fact, lose because
people thought that the charge was going to affect them, and didn’t understand just
how few vehicles were really going to be affected? It seems likely that the
number of people who thought that it was going to affect them is considerably
higher than the number actually going to be hit by the charge, and the Tories
won by playing on that unjustified level of fear. None of that alters the fact
than those most likely to be affected were those owning the oldest vehicles,
and thus likely to be relatively less well-off, or that the scrappage scheme
seems to have been inadequate. And the information about whether they would be
affected or not was readily available, but depended on people seeking it out
rather than being informed more directly.
The Welsh government may be
putting themselves in a very similar position with the 20mph zones being widely
introduced next month. Like ULEZ, this was a scheme initially supported by the
Tories, but they have seen an opportunity to make mischief and attract support
by now deciding to oppose it. Just as with ULEZ, the impact on people is likely
to be much less than many are assuming, because of the large number of
exceptions. And, just as with ULEZ, information
on those exemptions is freely available (although in this case much harder to
interpret; the website is far from being intuitive), but, again, people have to
seek it out rather than being notified in a more direct fashion. The way the
Tories are seeking to use the policy is simultaneously shameful and shameless,
but they’re pushing at a door left open by the Welsh government. If a party
devoid of principle or consistency decides to campaign in this way, playing on
or exaggerating people’s fears, part of the responsibility, at least, falls on
those whose woeful failure to communicate effectively what is happening has
enabled the Tories’ innate dishonesty.
Given a choice of how to get
from A to B, my choice is generally likely to be ‘as quickly as possible’: the
ideal would be for Scotty to simply beam me from A to B in a few seconds. In
the absence of Star Trek technology, there is always going to be a compromise
between various factors, including (but not limited to) speed, safety and environmental
impact. On balance, the Welsh government have probably got it about right, and
can tweak it as necessary in the future if the need arises, but they are
dismally failing to explain or persuade. That leaves a vacuum which is largely
being filled by disinformation and distortion. And those are Tory specialities.
No comments:
Post a Comment