It would be hard to argue that the Welsh
government’s performance during the coronavirus pandemic has been brilliant.
Errors have been made and they’ve been slow to act at times. Part of this may
be the result of an over-willingness to seek consensus with an English
government which has shown itself to have not the slightest interest in working
with anyone else. Part of it may be down to a lack of power to vary some
aspects of the response to the pandemic. And part of it may be down to the
porous nature of the long eastern border of Wales, which makes divergence more
difficult. None of that is enough to excuse the Welsh government for all its
failures – a government which truly put Wales first and foremost would have
diverged sooner and faster from the increasingly shambolic approach being taken
by England rather then held back because of the largely political fear of being
seen as ‘too nationalist’. Scotland’s response has not been perfect either,
although the less equivocal political leadership and greater willingness to
diverge there has helped.
Despite the imperfect response in Wales,
the polls suggest that the Welsh government, like its Scottish counterpart, is
significantly more trusted than the English government. The more cautious
approach is in tune with public opinion, and the willingness to at least
attempt to answer questions rather than bluster and lie has been notable. That
some people are frustrated with the slower pace of release is unarguable; we
still have less freedom than is being enjoyed across the border, and that seems
set to continue for a while at least. However, public support for that position
seems to be holding up. Whether that continues probably depends on what happens
in England. If the release of lockdown leads to an upsurge in cases in England,
the First Minister can probably count on becoming even more trusted, but if it
doesn’t, then the frustration will grow. The evidence to date is that the
former is rather more likely than the latter and like most I broadly support
the Welsh approach even if I’d quibble with some of the details. Only time will
tell.
The utter incompetence of the English PM and
his disastrous handling of the pandemic has left the Conservative Party in
Wales in a particularly difficult position – they had to decide whether to hang
on to Johnson’s coat-tails or to strike a more independent position. They have chosen
to ‘resolve’ that conflict by making repeated demands that Wales should follow
England more closely. Being as kind as I can, I assume that they sincerely
believe that Johnson has got it right and Drakeford has got it wrong, despite
all the current evidence suggesting precisely the opposite. Because if I didn’t
make that assumption, I’d be obliged to assume that their demands for copying
England amount to a demand that we should increase the Welsh infection and death
rates to match the English ones. They’re taking a huge gamble on Johnson’s
competence in the face of all the evidence to the contrary. If they’re wrong, then
effectively demanding that Wales should ‘level up’ the death rate rather than
act differently would be a highly original election strategy. Sir Humphrey, in
his customarily understated way, would probably call it ‘brave’.
2 comments:
The Bay team are not terribly bright, but compared to the Westminster rabble they are near geniuses. Was Johnson brain damaged by Covid, or did he harbour that condition from earlier in his life ?
Comparing parts of HMG with each other at this early stage I think is a bit of a stretch.
HMG in Wales (HMGW) like HMG in Scotland (HMGS)certainly sat the same test paper, but HM Union Government (HMUG) I think had a few more pages of questions to answer.
HMGW and HMGS have an election within twelve months and enhancing their brand and street cred is a clear consideration that will drive their thinking, therefor acting differently was a must to try and prove their value.
Leaving aside the scale and volume HMUG had to apply themselves to, at this stage the science has been abandoned by them in favour of reflating the economy and rebuilding government income. Such concerns do not weigh on HMGW as it is beyond their brief, but if they are thinking there might be another bag of money coming their way, I would not be too sure.
Sometime in the near future HMUG will present a new Emergency Powers Bill to Parliament that might address this issue and a small paragraph could well introduce the old colonial powers of “English Paramountcy” where in the next event HMGW and HMGS will cease to have the powers they currently have.
Post a Comment