I’m not sure
the comments are all entirely convincing however, although the suggestion that
the organisation “lost its way” after
the LG debacle has a ring of truth to it, as does the other comment about it
becoming less effective when the money ran out.
Perhaps he
thought all of this at the time but was simply reluctant to say so.
Total
abolition, however, seemed to be a bit like throwing the baby out with the
bathwater. The earlier success of the
organisation led to a certain amount of jealousy from other parts of the UK; so
it must have been doing something right for part of the time at least. I never really understood why the choice of a
way forward had to be quite as binary is the way it was presented – either an
arm’s-length quango run by the great and the good appointed by the government,
or full integration into the civil service.
No effort was made to try and keep the successful elements whilst
closing the democratic deficit – a compromise which could have been a better
way forward than drowning the organisation in the civil service culture.
(As an aside, it was interesting to read on the weekend that Plaid are looking to create a new body to fill the gap left by the WDA. I
remember being surprised, and not a little disappointed, a few years ago when Plaid’s
leader in the Assembly announced the party’s full support for merging the WDA
into the civil service. I knew that I wasn’t alone
in that surprise, although it was only several years later that I discovered
that the party’s spokesperson on the economy had, apparently, been equally
surprised.)
Abolition of quango-land
– a system of government where the great and the good are appointed by
mysterious processes to run major aspects of our national life – is something I’ve
long supported. So I have a lot of
sympathy with Carwyn’s position when he says “I do not agree that setting up a quango for your mates is the best way
of dealing with the Welsh economy”.
I do wonder though whether he’s told the other Carwyn Jones about this –
you know: the Carwyn Jones who recently set up new quangos to run Wales’ two “city
regions”?
3 comments:
The WDA did perform extremely well for a time in attracting inward investment to Wales, more so than any other nation or region in the UK. But what is left unsaid is that Wales' economy still declined (relatively to the UK) during that period. So it didn't compensate for other problems in the Welsh economy. By the end, the WDA was quite unpopular and perceived as being out of control
We are possibly missing the international brand that the WDA gave us. I totally agree that a middle ground should have been found and that a new body (not bringing back exactly the same WDA) could be a good idea.
John
Totally agree with anonymous
We all too often have assumed and are now almost conditioned to the mantra that Wales will be transformed economically by inward investment.
Pigs might fly
Unless we have true independence we are doomed to remain a colony (principality)
There is virtually no help for existing businessew or new start ups here
Look at our railways, our coal industry, and farming.
Perhaps I should also include fuel/electricity generation and steel making
All in a terrible state because control is not in our hands
John
Milk from West Wales is apparently being transported to Italy to be converted into powder for re-export to America. Would be interested in the money chain and flow of this operation
Post a Comment