In reacting to the
now infamous pasty tax proposed in this year’s budget, one former Labour
minister expressed his amazement that the government hadn’t seen the reaction
coming. It was, he said, a proposal
which the civil service had put before him but which he’d rejected.
There’s a similar
message behind the latest proposals for more monitoring of website traffic,
including e-mails. It’s another one
which was floated under Labour and has now been resurrected under the UK
Coalition. Just for a change, I agree
with Peter Black’s take on this “Once an
idea is fixed in the minds of advisors and civil servants, they keep revisiting
it until they find politicians prepared to take it forward”.
There is a certain
inevitability about the way that these things keep getting raised by our real
rulers. I don’t know whether it will
actually happen or not, but past
experience suggests that an alternative proposal is likely to be presented
which will be less intrusive – and which will then be built on on an
opportunistic basis as and when the proponents of the original idea see their
opportunity. Incremental changes always
manage to look less sinister than major changes.
There’s a
surveillance and control mindset lurking behind this one – and people with that
mindset aren’t just going to abandon their plans because of reluctant politicians.
1 comment:
"...our real rulers.... ..a surveillance and control mindset.."
What's new in the British State?
Post a Comment